Bukomansimbi District

by November 20, 2017

The access rates in Bukomansimbi vary from 70 % in Bigasa Sub-County to 95 % in Kibinge Sub-County. Bukomansimbi has 956 domestic water points which serve a total of 132,374 people – 123,039 in rural areas. 116 water points have been non-functional for over 5 years and are considered abandoned. Bukomansimbi has 1 piped schemes.

Access

86%

Rural Functionality

87%

Equity

10

Management

87%

Gender

63%

Population Density (people/km2) and Population

50 250 1,000 2,000
  100 500 1,500  
BTC Bukomasimbi TC 408
Bukomasimbi TC
Population 408
BGS Bigasa 235
Bigasa
Population 235
BTN Butenga 290
Butenga
Population 290
KBN Kibinge 342
Kibinge
Population 342
KTN Kitanda 208
Kitanda
Population 208

Population figures are projections to the above mentioned date based on UBOS census 2014 and district growth rates. Population density is calculated on land area only. Boundaries reflect the preliminary status only.

Access to Safe Water

20 % 60 %
  40 % 80 %
Total Access 86 %
Rural Access 86 %
Urban Access 95 %

BGS Bigasa 70 %
Bigasa
Population Served 29,694
BTC Bukomasimbi TC 95 %
Bukomasimbi TC
Population Served 9,334
BTN Butenga 95 %
Butenga
Population Served 37,146
KBN Kibinge 95 %
Kibinge
Population Served 31,622
KTN Kitanda 85 %
Kitanda
Population Served 24,576

Access to safe water is the ratio of people served by a safe water point and piped water supply to the total population.
The calculation is based on an estimated number of people per water point type. Maximum access rate can be 95%.

Functionality of Point Water Sources

60 % 80 %
70 % 90 %
Rural Functionality 87 %
Urban Functionality 94 %

BGS Bigasa 96 %
Bigasa
Functional Sources 245
BTC Bukomasimbi TC 94 %
Bukomasimbi TC
Functional Sources 155
BTN Butenga 80 %
Butenga
Functional Sources 173
KBN Kibinge 80 %
Kibinge
Functional Sources 137
KTN Kitanda 88 %
Kitanda
Functional Sources 130

Functionality is the ratio of functional water sources to all water sources. Sources not operating for five or more years are assumed to be abandoned, and hence are not included in the calculation.

People served per technology

Reasons for non-functionality

Type of Management

Source of Funding

District Water Supply Summary

Sub-CountyUrban/
Rural
PopulationPopulation
Served
AccessFunctionalityPoint Water SourcesPiped Water Systems
Protected
springs
Shallow wellsDeep boreholesRainwater
harvesting tanks
DamsValley
tanks
PSP/Kiosk, Tap standsYTHHICNWSC
RUWfPFNFTotFNFTotFNFTotFNFTotFNFTotFNFTotFNFTot
BUKOMANSIMBI                               
 1 BigasaRural42,61129,69470%96%-100%12-125466025429154-154---4-4------No
 2 KibingeRural33,28631,62295%80%--5413676215771161710111------------No
 3 Bukomasimbi TCUrban9,8269,33595%-94%100%5164482-28-8---1-11365141---No
 4 ButengaRural39,10237,14795%80%-100%61117279211001472119524---1-1---336411No
 5 KitandaRural28,87524,57685%88%-50%---3613492843266-661-1123------No
Total 153,700132,374868794801322515723559294802110125762631017291365141336411No
District 153,700132,374868794801322515723559294802110125762631017291365141336411No

F = Functional; NF = Non-Functional; Tot = Total; YT = Yard Tap; HH = Household Connections; IC = Institutional Connections

Piped Water Supply Systems

Type of Scheme/GFSNumber of
Schemes
Functionality of SystemType of ManagementWB in place
FunctionalNon-FunctionalPartially FunctionalPrivate OperatorWSCPrivate/IndividualNWSCOtherYesNo
Groundwater based/Not GFS11001000010
Total11000000010

GFS = Gravity Flow Scheme; WB = Water Board; WSC = Water Source Committee