Budaka District

by April 20, 2018

The access rates in Budaka vary from 59 % in Naboa Sub-County to 95 % in Iki-Iki Sub-County. Budaka has 707 domestic water points which serve a total of 192,632 people – 170,983 in rural areas. 56 water points have been non-functional for over 5 years and are considered abandoned. Budaka has 1 piped schemes.

Access

82%

Rural Functionality

93%

Equity

54

Management

86%

Gender

77%

Population Density (people/km2) and Population

50 250 1,000 2,000
  100 500 1,500  
KKL Kakule 565
Kakule
Population 565
KCH Kachomo 555
Kachomo
Population 555
LYM Lyama 432
Lyama
Population 432
NNS Nansanga 482
Nansanga
Population 482
BTC Budaka TC 725
Budaka TC
Population 725
BDK Budaka 541
Budaka
Population 541
NBA Naboa 512
Naboa
Population 512
KDR Kaderuna 648
Kaderuna
Population 648
IKI Iki-Iki 663
Iki-Iki
Population 663
KMR Kameruka 538
Kameruka
Population 538
KMN Kamonkoli 663
Kamonkoli
Population 663
MGT Mugiti 737
Mugiti
Population 737
KTR Katiira 593
Katiira
Population 593

Population figures are projections to the above mentioned date based on UBOS census 2014 and district growth rates. Population density is calculated on land area only. Boundaries reflect the preliminary status only.

Access to Safe Water

20 % 60 %
  40 % 80 %
Total Access 82 %
Rural Access 82 %
Urban Access 81 %

BDK Budaka 81 %
Budaka
Population Served 10,200
BTC Budaka TC 81 %
Budaka TC
Population Served 21,649
IKI Iki-Iki 95 %
Iki-Iki
Population Served 20,027
KCH Kachomo 95 %
Kachomo
Population Served 15,533
KDR Kaderuna 84 %
Kaderuna
Population Served 16,121
KKL Kakule 95 %
Kakule
Population Served 13,384
KMN Kamonkoli NWSC
Kamonkoli
Population Served NWSC
KMR Kameruka 91 %
Kameruka
Population Served 15,400
KTR Katiira 77 %
Katiira
Population Served 14,006
LYM Lyama 74 %
Lyama
Population Served 16,000
MGT Mugiti NWSC
Mugiti
Population Served NWSC
NBA Naboa 59 %
Naboa
Population Served 9,227
NNS Nansanga 95 %
Nansanga
Population Served 10,355

Access to safe water is the ratio of people served by a safe water point and piped water supply to the total population.
The calculation is based on an estimated number of people per water point type. Maximum access rate can be 95%.

Access to Safe Water

20 % 60 %
  40 % 80 %
Total Access 82 %
Rural Access 82 %
Urban Access 81 %

BDK Budaka 81 %
Budaka
Population Served 10,200
BTC Budaka TC 81 %
Budaka TC
Population Served 21,649
IKI Iki-Iki 95 %
Iki-Iki
Population Served 20,027
KCH Kachomo 95 %
Kachomo
Population Served 15,533
KDR Kaderuna 84 %
Kaderuna
Population Served 16,121
KKL Kakule 95 %
Kakule
Population Served 13,384
KMN Kamonkoli NWSC
Kamonkoli
Population Served NWSC
KMR Kameruka 91 %
Kameruka
Population Served 15,400
KTR Katiira 77 %
Katiira
Population Served 14,006
LYM Lyama 74 %
Lyama
Population Served 16,000
MGT Mugiti NWSC
Mugiti
Population Served NWSC
NBA Naboa 59 %
Naboa
Population Served 9,227
NNS Nansanga 95 %
Nansanga
Population Served 10,355

Access to safe water is the ratio of people served by a safe water point and piped water supply to the total population.
The calculation is based on an estimated number of people per water point type. Maximum access rate can be 95%.

Functionality of Point Water Sources

60 % 80 %
70 % 90 %
Rural Functionality 93 %
Urban Functionality 81 %

BDK Budaka 95 %
Budaka
Functional Sources 35
BTC Budaka TC 81 %
Budaka TC
Functional Sources 44
IKI Iki-Iki 91 %
Iki-Iki
Functional Sources 71
KCH Kachomo 97 %
Kachomo
Functional Sources 59
KDR Kaderuna 97 %
Kaderuna
Functional Sources 61
KKL Kakule 93 %
Kakule
Functional Sources 55
KMN Kamonkoli NWSC
Kamonkoli
Functional Sources 77
KMR Kameruka 90 %
Kameruka
Functional Sources 55
KTR Katiira 96 %
Katiira
Functional Sources 47
LYM Lyama 91 %
Lyama
Functional Sources 49
MGT Mugiti NWSC
Mugiti
Functional Sources 31
NBA Naboa 76 %
Naboa
Functional Sources 28
NNS Nansanga 98 %
Nansanga
Functional Sources 39

Functionality is the ratio of functional water sources to all water sources. Sources not operating for five or more years are assumed to be abandoned, and hence are not included in the calculation.

People served per technology

Reasons for non-functionality

Type of Management

Source of Funding

District Water Supply Summary

Sub-CountyUrban/
Rural
PopulationPopulation
Served
AccessFunctionalityPoint Water SourcesPiped Water Systems
Protected
springs
Shallow wellsDeep boreholesRainwater
harvesting tanks
DamsValley
tanks
PSP/Kiosk, Tap standsYTHHICNWSC
RUWfPFNFTotFNFTotFNFTotFNFTotFNFTotFNFTotFNFTot
BUDAKA                               
 1 KakuleRural14,09013,38695%93%--17-17---38341-11------------No
 2 NaboaRural15,7359,22759%76%--314---25328-55------------No
 3 Iki-IkiRural21,08320,02995%91%--2332612347249----11---------No
 4 KatiiraRural18,30614,00677%96%--4-421341-41-11------------No
 5 NansangaRural10,90110,35695%98%--314---36-36---------------No
 6 Budaka TCUrban26,84221,64981%-81%-819213303332-2------2572861913No
 7 KamerukaRural16,86615,40091%90%--2632932526127---------------No
 8 KamonkoliRural27,768NWSCNWSC93%--16-16---60262134-------11---Yes
 9 MugitiRural12,958NWSCNWSC100%--4-4---26-26---------1-1---Yes
 10 KachomoRural16,35215,53495%97%--141153-341-41112------------No
 11 LyamaRural21,59716,00074%91%--2-2---47552---------------No
 12 KaderunaRural19,23216,12184%97%-100%16-161-1411423141-1---------No
 13 BudakaRural12,54710,20081%95%--9-9---26228---------------No
Total 234,256192,62782938150145101551261848422506712191120003692861913No
District 234,256192,62782938150145101551261848422506712191120003692861913No

F = Functional; NF = Non-Functional; Tot = Total; YT = Yard Tap; HH = Household Connections; IC = Institutional Connections

Piped Water Supply Systems

Type of Scheme/GFSNumber of
Schemes
Functionality of SystemType of ManagementWB in place
FunctionalNon-FunctionalPartially FunctionalPrivate OperatorWSCPrivate/IndividualNWSCOtherYesNo
Groundwater based/Unknown10011000000
Total10010000000

GFS = Gravity Flow Scheme; WB = Water Board; WSC = Water Source Committee